-
Posts
620 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About scottedward
- Birthday 06/24/1974
Helpful Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Marital Status
Married
-
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Friendly Details
-
Grateful For
That others know peace, love, and kindness.
-
Your Motto
Watch where you walk
-
Doctrine /Affiliation
One Of The Hopefui
Other Details
-
Occupation
None
-
Website URL
https://www.facebook.com/scott.edward.belbey
Social Media
-
Twitter
https://twitter.com/BelbeyScott
Contact Methods
-
Yahoo
scott_edward-at-rocketmail.com
-
Skype
scott.belbey
Recent Profile Visitors
scottedward's Achievements
Revered Friend (8/17)
-
scottedward changed their profile photo
-
What works by Kirby Hensley have you read?
scottedward replied to Geordon's topic in Philosophy & Theory
I wonder who you think would call him a heretic, and in what context. Am I supposed to read the book to find out? -
Misunderstandings in civilized community
scottedward replied to VonNoble's topic in Philosophy & Theory
I think (or believe) our communication problems begin in the United States with capitalism. Too many parents work too long and too hard to care for families they allow X-Box to babysit for them. I think a national educational system is preferable to state run, since states often go broke, and yet our nation is the richest country in the world. -
Enemies begin through difference of opinion, does it not?
-
I'd like to think so.
-
What are they thinking (the deities) .....
scottedward replied to VonNoble's topic in Philosophy & Theory
His greatest weapon was fear, which he knew most criminals were victims of. -
The Difference
scottedward replied to Jonathan H. B. Lobl's topic in Interpath Dialogue, Universal Virtues and Values
I wouldn't think to argue either point.- 58 replies
-
- religion
- philosophy
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
The Difference
scottedward replied to Jonathan H. B. Lobl's topic in Interpath Dialogue, Universal Virtues and Values
I think it is the wish of others to feel special, unique, or of the elite that causes about 96% of the world's problems (as relating to religious intolerance or disagreements) If nobody cared what others believed, we'd have less cause to fight over it.- 58 replies
-
- religion
- philosophy
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Okay... 'You don't believe in nothing' is a double-negative. There's more, but nobody likes a smarty-pants.
-
However, is it a healthy practice to deliberately voice rejection or disbelief when none of it can be proved, regardless? There's a difference between constructive feedback (even from a non-believer) and blatant negativity. Regardless of what was really meant, telling an atheist they believe in 'nothing' usually doesn't end with flowers, children, rainbows, and happy puppies belching sunshine.
-
I don't think it small, and Dan can rub a few people the wrong way. He has that gift. I might have been one of them, but I can't honestly recall. Here's the thing. A person 100% secure with their convictions shouldn't need to debate whether or not the belief of others is true. If they're belief is absolute in their minds and heart, they'd feel secure enough to have room for additional ideas. They'd be comfortable discussing other beliefs without verbally expressing their skepticism.
-
I know that others believe what they claim. Shouldn't that be enough?
-
Religious Persecution
scottedward replied to scottedward's topic in * Welcome - ULC Minister's Introduction Junction *
i agree with you. It very much seems to me that the church of Scientology has become a money-making machine, and I've very little patience for any practice that utilizes belief to make a profit. -
Religious Persecution
scottedward replied to scottedward's topic in * Welcome - ULC Minister's Introduction Junction *
Yes it does, excuse me for taking so long. -
Religious Persecution
scottedward replied to scottedward's topic in * Welcome - ULC Minister's Introduction Junction *
I can empathize, my friend. -
Religious Persecution
scottedward replied to scottedward's topic in * Welcome - ULC Minister's Introduction Junction *
I'm not entirely sure if the differences of scope or type should matter, if any of us are able to question motives.