cuchulain

Because in posts where we said christians use terror, you specified you think it means final death instead of bbq...which were you lying about?

Your interpretation is not infallible because you believe it

You assume your perspective to be correct while others are flawed, without the desire to examine your way. That's the definition of arrogant. I will judge anyone who says the Jews got what they deserved. That is a bigotted statement of poor moral character, plain and simple. And if you think you can justify mass murder as you keep attempting you need to reexamine your claim to moral superiority, because you are wrong.

The only thing that makes this forum worth it for me is compatriots and an understanding of lurkers who need exposure to the other side of the debate. Kind of like politicians trying to get the fence sitters.

I find the implication that a group deserved Nazi death camps to be abhorrent at best...and if that is what mieshac supports as a "true Christian" and other true Christian's can't see this needs condemned, there's definitely an issue with moderators here.

Some legit history...macs0647 is 13.6 billion light years away. This means that the time taken for the light from that Galaxy to reach earth is 137000 years .. older than the universe biblically speaking.

Scripture is not legitimate history.

If they are allowed to redefine it then eventually they will claim we all have belief in something...oh wait. I have heard that one before...

Me. I will be loaded just as soon as Uncle Sam pays up.

I want to shake Schroedingers box before I open it and see if it meows...

Johnathan...have you heard the good news of Odin?

Agreed. I keep thinking that the atheist perspective needs represented to those reading so it's not too one sided. But I find more and more that posters already have their minds set and merely agree with the position they like or attack the position they don't. There are a few who seem to legitimately have an interest in sharing the board fairly but not enough, and now I find myself examining my own motivation for being here.

Deliberate. And our objection is also within the definition of insane, excepting that may be a mod will eventually catch on to Dan's deliberate baiting.

"I believe you guys are extremely liberal"...see, when I say you either do this on purpose or cannot learn, the reason is because of these statements. You have been told numerous times I am not liberal...yet still, even though you apologized for the assumption in the past, you make it again...and again...and again...and still don't get it. But yeah, clearly nobody else on this board notices the baiting that you constantly provide, even to the point where fellow Christians are telling you that you make false assumptions...

A person makes a mistake. It's pointed out. They apologize. Repeat a dozen or so times. Is it still a mistake or is it obviously deliberate? If it's still a mistake, the person has trouble learning. If deliberate, they are baiting. Which are you Dan?

I live in Georgia. Broken English is the native tongue and I guess I have adapted. Unfortunately the truth...

People with faith are wrong at least as often as anyone else. My father in law is devout. That doesn't keep him from being wrong occasionally. And you keep telling us you don't have enough faith to be an atheist. Clearly your wrong about what we believe, on purpose. Let's face it, nobody is buying the misunderstanding stance when you say we believe nothing, anymore. You've apologized too many times for it to work again.

I got hung up on the age making it true somehow

Some believe wrong answers to be better than none. I'll take truth instead.

Also that the Christian concept is flawed at best.

All Dan's questions are irrelevant to reality. He demands answers as if my lack of them proves his position. It obviously doesn't. My lack of ability to explain the origin of everything doesn't mean his mythology is correct. If he wants anyone to believe it is up to him to convince us, not us to convince him why we don't.

Plenty of religions that are equally false like that.

pretty much replicates...but not quite. By that particular piece of logic, you should fully admit that the bible is NOT inspired of God, because it has clearly been altered over the centuries.

Two parts of the Bible that disagree? Yep... contradictory.

Christians often say god only gives you what you can bear. Clearly wrong of course. Millions of new borns born with fatal disease, millions with cancer, multitudes killed by 'acts of god'...definitely not immortal.