Messiah

Member
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Messiah

Helpful Information

  • Gender
    Male

Messiah's Achievements

Registered User

Registered User (1/17)

  1. As I stated; I did not expect a sincere or intellectual reply. However,When quoting posts you must read the entire string. The post was concerning the beginning of life and consciousness. So yes, she was referring to; how energy formed life on earth. reflection goes a long way.
  2. This reply is going to bring this wonderful post sorely off track, however, since you responded and I am quite new here, there are somethings I find quite disturbing. Things that I have never encountered on other forums. To answer your question; I hope you find the answers inside your last post satisfactory as to why I felt that you digressed, from the reverends original reasoning. I come not to judge you but perhaps you do not realize how you seem to be representing yourself. I can tell you are an intelligent man and this is why I am so baffled by your remarks. For the past four months I have been reading and observing many of the posts on this forum and from an impartial outsiders point of view I can’t help but notice that you and many others have misinterpreted and distorted information while choosing to give false or misleading information that misrepresents and exaggerates your own authority. Reading your reply to a fellow reverend, I can only say that I am getting the impression that many of you enjoy prevaricating your answers by deliberately misstating, misconstruing, altering and, bending other people’s quotes incorrectly. My words I speak in peace as I confess that in my opinion I see you speaking in curves while you allow your words to warp and pervert the truth. Again, read your responses carefully you’re words reinstate what has already been stated as if it was never stated at all. To me this looks like you are trying to turn people away from what is acceptable or correct by confusing the issue. I am not determining what is acceptable by what is INDIVIDUALLY correct or right, I am determining what is acceptable by what behavior is fair to all. By the disagreeable answers that you and many others here have given to members that supply valid sources and statements, I can only assume that these responses are well planned, purposeful vexations that are carefully worded to rile the speaker into a verbal battle of wills. An example of this is your statement that; The Reverend Irma did not understand what she was speaking of and your statement stars glow just because there hot. I am certain no one would speak of things they did not understand so why did you misread and misunderstand the most logical statements at another person’s chagrin? The explanation given for energy and why stars glow was sound and reasonable and yet you dismissed and debunked it as if it had no validity. May I be so bold to ask why you feel that YOUR statements and opinions are CORRECT and others are not? I am certain you will ignore this question for the answer is obvious, you enjoy the game and the lure of catching a victim in your tormenting snare and it seems like any provocation will do. This of course is just friendly observation coupled with astounding realization. I mean you no harm but do you enjoy your own peevishness? I find the game quite intellectually boring and depreciative. What is your Incentive to keep it up? I have been noticing that a lot of these posts have been intellectually stimulating until someone of your scope and lack of restraint comes along and ruins their integrity by discrediting a fellow forum members beliefs with brazen insolence and impertinence. Blessed are the peacemakers yet there is no peace to be found in defaming words. Many topics I would have enjoyed responding to, yet this demeaning behavior that so many here display has spoiled any chance of intellectual feedback. I mean no offense of course. As a noble gesture I must say that surely others must notice this repetitive and continuous display of arrogance throughout this forum. I am new here and noticed it immediately. In fact, it was your post that made me sign in and respond. Up until this point I was taking a backseat enjoying the intellectual flow of the conversation until it was completely interrupted by disrespectful, ambiguous, prevaricating, and irrelevant language and arguments that only accomplished evading the point of issue and getting the topic off tract. It is so unpraisworthy to see such petty carping and criticism, such as calling peoples theories incorrect, this form of retorting is hardly valid objections. In fact, it is nothing more than contentious baiting and tempestuous onslaughts on a person’s good character. Incidentally encyclopedias do not provide up to date information and therefore it is best to seek alternative resources when attempting to substantiate valid information. The best resources are those that provide direct knowledge on the subject at hand. Encyclopedias are sets of books containing articles on various topics, covering all branches of knowledge. All aspects of one subject are usually not covered in these types of resources and many times the information relayed is bias to the opinions of the researchers who are sharing the information with the resource directory.
  3. I believe the reverend was quite clear in stating the energy that she speaks of is the energy that formed creation. Since the answer to that is all speculation one can only presume it was partly the vacuum energy of space and the dark energy of the "Big Bang." None the less, please be aware that your corrections on the Reverend Irma’s post are deviating from the truth, It appears your authority on this matter is a bit erroneous and inaccurate not to mention completely unbecoming and inappropriate. The reverend Irma quotes Carl Sagan the Founder and First President of The Planetary Society and consultant and adviser to NASA and you say she is incorrect? Do you realize when you say that she is incorrect that you are also calling her source Carl Sagan incorrect? How are you more of an authority on this matter then Carl Sagan? Are you aware that Carl Sagan briefed the Apollo astronauts before their flights to the Moon, and was an experimenter on the Mariner, Viking, Voyager, and Galileo expeditions to the planets. He helped solve the mysteries of the high temperature of Venus (a massive greenhouse effect), the seasonal changes on Mars (windblown dust) and the reddish haze of Titan (complex organic molecules). For his work, Dr. Sagan received the NASA Medals for Exceptional Scientific Achievement and for Distinguished Public Service twice, as well as the NASA Apollo Achievement Award. Asteroid 2709 Sagan is named after him. He was also given the John F. Kennedy Astronautics Award of the American Astronautical Society, the Explorers Club 75th Anniversary Award, the Konstantin Tsiolokovsky Medal of the Soviet Cosmonautics Federation, and the Masursky Award of the American Astronomical Society: To substantiate that The reverends information is accurate, please refer to the following reference material: The sun is considered a star by; NASA; http://sunearthday.gsfc.nasa.gov/2009/TTT/64_nearest.php Energy and Electricity by NASA; http://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/topnav/materials/listbytype/What_Is_Electricity.html Energy and Electricity books; http://scifiles.larc.nasa.gov/text/kids/Problem_Board/problems/electricity/electricity2.html Electricity By; Steve Parker and Laura Buller What Is Electricity? By; Lisa Trumbauer